So I watched Rudy on Foxnews Sunday, and I have to say, he didn't really clear things up for me.  I'm personally against abortion, but I believe a woman should have a choice.  I know I have blonde hair, but, huh?  I really don't think he helped himself there.  Then, was I the only one who noticed that it seemed like when it came to gun control and illegal immigration, that he was essentially saying that as mayor of NYC, he had to take one stand, but as president he would take a different?  He said this quite a bit too.  And was I the only one who noticed an awful lot of sweating?  Look, I respect Rudy for his stand on terror(and once again he did well with that topic), Iraq, tax cuts, and of course how he handled himself after 9-11.  But I really don't think he came off well.  Now, if it comes down to him and Hillary, I will definately not take the route of that Lamb guy.  That's just lunacy and it's almost how we ended up with that global warming propagandist, algore as president.  But Bill Kristol of the Foxnews Sunday panel brought up a great point.  At some point it could come down to Rudy and another Republican for the nomination.  And if the other is just as strong on terrorism and Iraq, but is solidly pro-life, Rudy is going to lose.  While I do agree with Dick Morris's COLUMN  on townhall.com to some degree, I just don't know if Rudy can win over the conservative base.  We shall see.  The Republican debate on Tuesday night (on the evil Foxnews!) could be interesting.  At least we won't have to see that egomaniac Chris Matthews try and make himself the star of the debate.  It's unbelievable how full of himself he is.  Oh, one more thing.  Mike Wallace asks Mitt Romney when he first had sex?!  Is that decreped has been going to ask little miss entitlement the same question?  Well, of course we all know the answer to that.  Unfreaking believable...oh, wait...very freaking believable.