So let me get this straight.  Presidential candidate Barrack Obama wants us out of Iraq and doesn't want us to invade Iran.  Meanwhile, in a speech today, he said he wouldn't hesitate to invade PAKISTAN?  Now what he said, was if there was "actionable intelligence."  Where the heck do I start?  First, Iraq and Iran were/are not allies of ours.  Pakistan is.  So, we shouldn't invade countries that were/are not allies of ours, but we should invade a country that is?  Hey, question Barrack?  What the heck do you think that would do to his government?  As Mark Levin correctly pointed out tonight, Pakistani leader Pervez Musharraf is the best we can hope for right now.  But under Barrack's thinking, who cares?!  The only thing that I can conclude is this.  Barrack Obama is feeling the sting of Shrill Hill's "attack" on him after his ridiculous answer at the CNN/YouTube debate recently, where he said he would meet with our enemies without preconditions.  Hillary then came out the next day and said his answer was "naive" and "irresponsible."  Obama met with Colin Powell a while ago to talk about national security.  I hardly think that Powell would agree with this type of insanity.  At the end of the day, all this shows is Barrack Obama's inexperience.  And hey, here's another question for the candidate.  How are the loony far-leftists going to react to this, Barrack?  The only war they support nowadays is the war on Global Warming...um....Climate Change...whatever the heck they're calling it now (anyone else wondering where all of these hurricanes are?)  Barrack Obama strikes me as being a nice person.  But, he also strikes me as being clueless when it comes to the War on Terror (of course, most Democrats are....John Edwards bumper sticker anyone?)
Democrats cannot be trusted with the defense of our country.  They cannot be trusted to fight terrorism.  Barrack Obama made that point crystal clear today.